Ed McCabe and Associates Show U.S. Senator
and Top NIH Directors Ozone-Using PCR- Negative Ex-AIDS Patients
1992 July. Ed McCabe author of
"Oxygen Therapies" went to Washington on July 22nd,
1992. The trip was made after setting up private meetings with 2
U.S. Congressmen to coincide with the meeting that former Iowa
Congressman Berkly Bedell and Ed McCabe had set up on the same
day with U.S. Senator Tom Harkin, the former Presidential
Mr. Bedell and Mr. McCabe decided to
invite 2 doctors that had each brought a patient from HIV+ to
HIV-. They also invited Jim Caplan, the man responsible for
convincing the Cubans to approve medical ozone therapy for
general use, and Dr. John Pittman, an ozone using doctor,and one
of his recently denied treatment AIDS patients. Dr. Pittman's
office was closed down by the North Carolina state medical board
in the middle of successful clinical ozone trials due to
"ozone not being FDA approved." They visited the
Congressmen, were warmly received at each meeting, and ended up
in turn at Senator Harkin's office for our meeting with him,
where they were joined at this point by Dr. Michael Carpendale
and his boss from the San Francisco Veterans Administration
Senator Harkin scheduled us for only a
1/2 hour meeting, but he was so intrigued by our proof that we
discussed ozone successfully treating AIDS with him for one and
one half hours. He immediately decided to set up a meeting
between us and the NIH's (National Institute of Health)
Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director, Dr.Anthony
Fauci. The AIDS "problem" comes under the jurisdiction
of this institute, and Dr. Fauci has been referred to as the U.S.
Government's "AIDS Czar." Senator Harkin is on the
NIH appropriations committee, so he has their ear.
1992 Aug On August 20th we met in
NIH's building 31 wing 7A room 24 with Dr. Fauci and his boss
Deputy NIH Director Dr. Moskowitz. Also present were Dr. Hill,
Dr. Killan, and other legislative and legal aides. Mike Hall and
Marina Metallios were there to observe for Senator Harkin's
Office. About 30 people attended.
We presented our two ozone treated
patients who no longer were HIV+, and no longer had fevers,
swollen lymph nodes, diarrhea, pain, night sweats, weight loss,
or any other manifestation of the AIDS/ARC disease. We handed Dr.
Fauci and the others copies of their medical documentation, and
they listened to Doctor Carpendale and one other doctor and their
former AIDS patients. Dr. Latino from Medizone spoke of the
flawless ozone animal trials that had already been done by
Medizone. Dr. Pittman and one of his patients made emotional
pleas for the open medical use of ozone so he could finish his
clinical ozone trials. I asked for the same, gave them a brief 50
year history of the effectiveness of medical ozone on hundreds of
thousands of people in Europe, and cited ozone's perfect
safety record in millions of dosages. We made a sound,
experienced, documented, and reasonable case for the immediate
investigation of ozone's effectiveness in treating AIDS
successfully. I also asked if anything could be done to influence
the FDA to halt its suppressions of ozone-using M.D.'s. We
were told that the NIH had no power over the FDA.
Comment: Picture this. Here's our
small but dedicated group gathered at a round table with the U.S.
Government's official AIDS policy makers. Around the outside
of the table are aides, secretaries, assistants, and division
chiefs. There were no big corporations funding us, as is usually
the everyday case at these meetings. Although the NIH people only
had to walk down the hall to be there, we all had to take time
out from work and pay our own considerable travel, hotel, and
meal expenses. We came from all over the country simply to help
our fellow countrymen dying from AIDS. We were sitting right
there at the table with two now perfectly healthy former AIDS
patients testing HIV negative - one PCR (Polymerase Chain
Reaction - a test for any of the seven nucleotides of the HIV
virus itself) negative, and one Western Blot/Elisa (HIV antibody
presence) negative. We were sitting there with the examples and
their records showing complete eradication of all secondary
diseases, their actual doctors, a politically harassed-doctor and
his patient who can't get the treatment, and several thick
notebooks of ozone medical references from the U.S. and
What answer did we get? "We see no
reason to pursue this." Let me repeat that: "We see no
reason to pursue this." And, "They are obviously so
healthy that they must not have had the disease." And,
"We won't look at this treatment unless you have the
patients PCR tested twice before treatment proving the presence
of the HIV virus, stored blood from when they were positive, two
PCR tests during treatment, and two PCR tests after ozone
treatment proving the absence of the virus." What a reply
from an institution funded by our tax dollars to find a cure for
AIDS while people suffer and tragically slowly waste away. Not
exactly encouraging was it? The weight of evidence sitting right
there was enough to immediately investigate ozone, without adding
all the new requirements on. The NIH has billions of dollars, and
they could have done something after all we went through, you
would think they could have at least made some phone calls to
other doctors and patients as a goodwill gesture, but to only say
in effect, "Go home"? Even though they did give us a
clearly defined goal to shoot for, I couldn't help feeling
that the goal line was just moved way back.
Analysis: Here's the problem with
the current NIH reasoning:
1. Although they said they were
unknowledgeable about the FDA's history of seizing ozone
machines, harassing ozone using doctors, and forcing doctors to
falsely claim ozone as worthless, they did hear me tell them of
all this and how hard it was to get any doctors to show up at all
to testify and present evidence to them. How can anyone conduct
open trials on this beneficial treatment if the FDA will close
them down as soon as they open the doors?
2. Promoting the unproven "HIV
causes AIDS" scenario, they want 6 PCR HIV tests, each
costing around 350 dollars. Total of $2,100+ per patient. First
of all, there are several PCR tests around, and none of this is
covered by insurance, so which PCR test will they believe?
And who's going to pay for it? The
ozone doctors are financially strapped, and the AIDS patients
have already spent their savings on hospitals, doctors and drugs
like AZT, DDI, and etcetera. There were also no PCR tests
commonly available back when the patients we brought in first
tested HIV positive, so having PCR's on them was an
impossible requirement! Also, many of the patents on ozone
therapy are now in the public domain, so no pharmaceutical
company will support research.
3. They told us, via their announcement
that they will not consider ozone unless we met the new PCR
requirements, that the HIV virus is the ONLY thing to look for.
Nowhere has it ever been proven that the HIV virus is the only
definitive cause of AIDS; it was simply announced one day in the
media as a probable cause. Dr. Gallo's work "HIV causes
AIDS" was proven fraudulent. According to the latest
international AIDS conference held in Amsterdam (1992), people
die from AIDS who never test positive for HIV! The virus is
probably only a promoter or possibly a co-factor of the disease.
So why judge ozone's effectiveness upon the presence or
absence of a possibly non- essential virus? Why ignore the most
significant facts proving complete eradication of all secondary
diseases and symptoms? This is a far more compelling test of
whether or not to immediately begin research into ozone, if those
who suffer can have their suffering eliminated, whether or not
they test "PCR negative."
Comment: What about the quality of their
life since ozone all by itself? The way the Center For Disease
Control has decided to officially classify if someone has AIDS or
not tells the story. They look for the presence of several
"hallmark" diseases all occurring at once. Both
patients that we brought in had completely eliminated their
secondary infections and any clinical symptoms. Therefore by
definition, besides testing HIV negative, they no longer had AIDS
according to CDC guidelines!
The real live people with their medical
records and blood tests were sitting right in front of the NIH
employees - yet they could not see. Or they chose not to see.
Let's hope more practical thinking will win out in the
Just so you understand medical ozone in
the proper treatment of AIDS, a few shots of medical ozone are
not going to be magic bullets. Successful ozone AIDS treatment
has always been 2 to 5 hours a day of a number of oxidative and
other therapies for three to six weeks in a row, depending upon
the particular aggregate methods employed. These methods are
always combined with lifestyle changes, proper diet, eliminative
organ cleansing, a spiritual or moral balance to help eliminate
denial of self, and the inclusion of an immune system rebuilding
6 U.S. doctors have reported to me over
200 people turning HIV negative. I also have video interview
proof that this therapy is remarkably effective on cancer and
even diseases like multiple sclerosis. As a society we should
look in the direction of ozone soon, instead of watching more die
needlessly as we continue chasing the old ways that obviously
Ed McCabe's publication "03 VS
AIDS" has over 120 medical references on the efficacy of
ozone. Further documentation, info, publications, tapes,
subscriptions, and past issues are available from:
"The Family News"
9845 N.E. Second Ave.
Miami Shores, FL 33138.
United States of America.
Copyrighted 1992, 1993, 1994 & 2000 By Ed McCabe.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
NON COMMERCIAL DISTRIBUTION ENCOURAGED.
Ozone is Produced by Antibodies
During Bacterial Killing
The Scripps Research Institute La
Jolla, California November 14, 2002.
The Scripps Research Institute (TSRI) is
reporting that antibodies can destroy bacteria,
playing a hitherto unknown role in immune protection.
Furthermore, when antibodies do this, they appear to produce the
reactive gas ozone.
The ozone may be part of a previously
unrecognized killing mechanism that would enhance the
defensive role of antibodies by allowing them to participate
directly in the killing. Previously, antibodies were believed
only to signal an immune response. Also called immunoglobulins,
antibodies are secreted proteins produced by immune cells that
are designed to recognize a wide range of foreign pathogens.
After a bacterium, virus, or other pathogen enters the
bloodstream, antibodies target antigens [proteins, fat molecules,
and other pieces of the pathogen] that are specific to that
foreign invader. These antibodies then alert the immune system to
the presence of the invaders and attract lethal
"effector" immune cells to the site of infection.
For the last hundred years, immunologists
have firmly held that the role of antibodies was solely to
recognize pathogens and signal the immune system to make an
immune response. The conventional wisdom was that the dirty work
of killing the pathogens was to be left to other parts of the
immune system. Now, Scripps has demonstrated that
antibodies also have the ability to kill bacteria. This
suggests that rather than simply recognizing foreign antigens and
then activating other parts of the immune system to the site of
infection, the antibodies may further enhance the immune response
by directly killing some of the bacteria themselves.
Antibodies appear to make ozone , which they
detected through its chemical signature, which no other known
molecule has. Never before has ozone been detected in
It has been known that all antibodies have
the ability to produce hydrogen peroxide, but they need to first
have available a molecule known as "singlet" oxygen -
another highly reactive oxygen species - to use as a substrate.
Singlet oxygen is an energetically charged form of oxygen that
forms spontaneously during normal metabolic processes. Phagocytes
like neutrophils produce singlet oxygen and are the most likely
source of the substrate for antibody production of hydrogen
peroxide. Antibodies attract neutophils to the site of an
infection. Once there, the neutrophils will engulf and destroy
bacteria and other pathogens by blasting them with singlet oxygen
and other oxidative molecules.
The antibodies combine singlet oxygen
with water to produce hydrogen peroxide, producing ozone as a
Another interesting finding is that the
antibodies carry the reaction through an unusual intermediate
chemical species of dihydrogen trioxide, a
reduced form of ozone. Dihydrogen trioxide
H2O2 + O1 =
H2O3 has also never before been
observed in biological systems, and its presence as an
intermediate has been the source of considerable speculation in
the scientific community. The team's reported detection of
ozone is strong support of this proposed dihydrogen trioxide
intermediate, and now the team is tackling the larger question of
what it means.
The research article, "Evidence for
Antibody-Catalyzed Ozone Formation in Bacterial Killing" is
authored by Paul Wentworth, Jr., Jonathan E. McDunn, Anita D.
Wentworth, Cindy Takeuchi, Jorge Nieva, Teresa Jones, Cristina
Bautista, Julie M. Ruedi, Abel Gutierrez, Kim D. Janda, Bernard
M. Babior, Albert Eschenmoser, and Richard A. Lerner, and appears
in the November 18, 2002 "Science Express," the
advanced publication edition of the journal Science. The article
will appear in Science later this year.