American  British  German  Spanish  Chinese  Russian  Indian  French 

This wesite is best viewed
with either Firefox or Opera.

Firefox 2


Media Ignores Facts of Successful
AIDS and Cancer treatments

By Ed McCabe,
Author of "Oxygen Therapies - A New Way of Approaching Disease, C. 1988"

Two Examples of peer reviewed medical proof commonly being ignored by the media. Look at any statistical cancer chart showing the exploding incidences of cancer. The line almost goes straight up. We are obviously in a crisis situation. Some, especially those already in the medical profession will always say, "Well, if this Medical Ozone therapy was any good, I would know about it already, wouldn't I?" If the expert saying this doesn't think the news is edited, then perhaps he can explain why he never heard about this peer reviewed study done at a major US medical school, and published in a major US scientific journal. When you read this short summary, ask yourself. "This peer reviewed study shows ozone can stop cancer. Why wasn't it front page news all over the country?"

On August 22nd, 1980, Doctors F. Sweet, M.S. Kao, & S. Lee in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the Washington University School of Medicine, in St Louis, Missouri, along with W. Hagar of the Saint Louis Air Pollution Control Board together published in "Science" a U.S. peer reviewed scientific journal, in Volume 209, on pages 931-933, their study entitled: "Ozone Selectively Inhibits Human Cancer Cell Growth." They announce "Evidently the mechanisms for defense against ozone damage are impaired in human cancer cells." "All of the cancer cells (lung, breast, uterine and endometrial) showed marked dose-dependent growth inhibition in ozone at .3 and .5 parts per million" and the normal healthy human cells were not affected. "Evidently cancer cells are less able to compensate for the oxidative burden of ozone than normal cells." They also stated that ozone inhibits cancer 40 to 60%, and up to 90% of the time in a dose dependent manner, yet there was no response from mainstream medicine.

If you never heard of this, which is only one of thousands of international studies which are all good examples of how well ozone works, don't feel bad, because you're not alone. Think about this. You know all those nice moms and grandmothers at the mall who sadly lost family members to cancer? They will smile, and ask you to donate to the anti cancer societies - and to "dig just a little deeper" for a bigger donation - so we can "find a cure for cancer." Well, they were never shown this study on the news either. Medicine is big business filled with good people who have no idea how they are being used.

One isolated fluke? Hardly. Here's another good example. Have you seen the US peer reviewed study proving ozone destroys HIV viruses 97 to 100% of the time, and yet is harmless to normal healthy blood components? You must ask yourself, why haven't I? This astonishing breakthrough absolutely should have been front-page news, and the lead broadcast news story all over the country!

In October of 1991 the peer reviewed "JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEMATOLOGY," also known as Blood Journal, published a major breakthrough for US medical thinking, three years after a study of medical ozone had concluded. The groundbreaking (for the US) ozone used to treat HIV work of MD's Wells, Latino, Galvachin, & Poiesz was published as: "Inactivation of HIV Type 1 by Ozone In Vitro"

It appeared in "Blood Journal, Volume 78 Number 7, Oct 11, 1991, page 1882." The study described the research coordinated by Dr. Bernard Poiesz from Syracuse State University of New York Research Hospital. 15 times they did the experiment and 15 times they got the same results. They applied ozone to HIV infected factor 8 blood. The ozone completely removed the HIV virus from the blood 97 to 100% of the time, yet was non-toxic to normal healthy blood components. I personally did what I could to help everyone by announcing this ongoing study back in 1988, in my "Oxygen Therapies" book.

So please humble yourself a little, and please don't tell someone that "If it was any good, you would know about it." Fact is, you're too busy to dig it out, and the interlocking directorate media and medical corporations and their sister medical unions are in no hurry to tell you about a therapy that is safe, effective, and costs less than their propped up, behind the times, outdated products. It's simply bad for their business, and "Human suffering be damned."

© 2001 Ed McCabe

line   shad
shad2 shad3